Management style definition generally accepted without a broad term. In a sense, the totality of the individual driving style, as the driver interacts with his followers. This includes the way in which the leader provides the overall direction and specific instruction. This includes the way managers communicate with your followers and how to involve them in the work environment, the manner and approach of providing direction, implementing plans, and motivating people
Leadership styles are often used interchangeably management styles, although significant differences they are the real leaders and managers. In a sense, all senior managers, but not all the leaders of leaders. One key difference is seen in the followers. They respond to the real leaders because they want to, not because they have to.
The question of whether or not the teachers’ leadership styles and management styles has not received as much attention as other issues considered key to effective learning. However, regardless of whether they label it or not, the ways teachers are not the typical treatment for students and classrooms. Here are five driving style that can be seen in the classroom:
1. Autocratic Leader
2. Democratic Leader
3. bureaucratic Leader
4. Benevolent Leader
5. transformation Leader
the idea of an autocratic leadership evokes the stern and unfeeling dictator, but in reality many authoritarian leaders, and the teachers are very nice people.
autocratic teachers can use group discussion techniques, but the discussion topics and procedures are strictly controlled, the teacher input from students.
In theory, this management style is hailed as the one that best serves the students involved. The underlying assumption is for the students themselves, not just the teacher, the responsibility for managing learning. In practice, many teachers ask students input, but retains the ultimate responsibility for decision-making for themselves. Even in the hands of a qualified doctor, it takes time to collect input and find something approaching a consensus group.
follows the orders of the bureaucratic leadership of the school’s leadership and questions without the corporate hierarchy, training, and there is no change. Lesson plans and workshop materials prepared in accordance with acceptable institutional practice. If you feel the power, daily activities permitted in a group discussion, the bureaucratic leadership will do no more and no less.
Hallmark approach a benevolent leader of good feelings and good will. The underlying assumption is becoming a friend to the students, to make them more receptive to instruction. Much of what passes through student-centered education could be characterized as benign leadership by the teacher. The teacher is to serve as a friend and mentor, providing maximum freedom of individual choice and action.
As the title suggests, the transformation and management of change. A passionate faith in a vision of the future possibilities of transformational leaders are trying to change the way students think about themselves, learning, and expectations for the future. It requires a high degree of enthusiasm and energy on the part of the driver that is contagious. The students see the value of vision and willing to follow the lead reached.
This style sounds almost fanatical in nature, but there is a sound scientific basis. James MacGregor Burns introduced the approach in his 1978 book on leadership. Burns researcher Bernard Bass expanded the original work and present what is known today as the Bass theory of transformational leadership. He published his findings in a 1985 book, leadership and performance, and continued leading research until his death in 2007.
Source by Bryan West Ph.D.